BuildStackAI
BuildStackAI
SMARTER PRE-CON. BETTER OUTCOMES.

Review with accuracy. Build with confidence.

It's an expensive problem.

The construction industry loses billions annually to drawing errors that were detectable before ground was broken.

$0B
lost annually to rework from drawing errors
0%
of RFIs were catchable in pre-con review
0x
cost multiplier: field fix vs. pre-bid catch

From PDF upload to actionable findings

app.buildstackai.com
Upload drawing set
Extracting pages
Review findings on drawings
Spec cross-reference

Real findings from a real project

K-12 school modernization — 221 pages, 6 disciplines, analyzed in under 20 minutes.

57High
39Medium
5Low
15RFI
116Total
HIGHCORD-0212A1.6Trade Conflict
Conflicting Scope for Gas Utility Relocation
Sheet A1.4 Keyed Note 2 directs "RELOCATE GAS VALVE". Sheet A1.6 Keyed Note 2 shows "RELOCATED LOCATION OF GAS METER". Unclear if these are the same scope — creating bidding risk and a guaranteed RFI.
HIGHCNST-0020A9.3Constructability
Conflicting Anchoring Methods for Hollow Metal Door Frames
Details 2, 6, 9, and 13 specify both "3 JAMB ANCHORS & 1 BASE ANCHOR PER SIDE" and "2-16d nails at each anchor" — nailing into hollow metal frames is not constructable.
HIGHCOMP-0057FA401Code Issue
Fire Alarm Pull Station Shown 12 ft from Exit — NFPA 72 Requires Within 5 ft
The fire alarm plan for Building B shows a manual pull station at the north corridor exit mounted approximately 12 feet from the exit doorway. NFPA 72 §17.14.8.2 requires manual pull stations within 5 feet of each exit. Current placement will fail inspection and require conduit rework.
HIGHCORD-0251P6.1Trade Conflict
Conflicting Water Heater Type Between Plan and Detail
Plumbing sheets P2.1D and P2.1F specify instantaneous water heaters. But the installation detail on P6.1 shows a tank-style unit — a fundamental design conflict between documents.
RFIRFI-0040A1.7Missing Reference
Referenced drinking fountain detail sheet does not exist
Keyed Note 1 references "DETAIL 13/A9.0.1" — but sheet A9.0.1 does not exist in the drawing index. Contractor cannot price or build this item without the correct detail.
HIGHCNST-0035M6.2Constructability
Insufficient Screw Embedment for Duct Support
Detail 5/M6.2 specifies #10 wood screws with only 1" minimum embedment for exposed duct support. This provides inadequate pull-out resistance for suspended mechanical equipment.

You just won a $4.2M school remodel.

180 pages of drawings. 6 disciplines.

Your pre-con team has 72 hours to review before the subcontractor deadline.

Your team finds 12 issues.

Missed 35.

$280K
in change orders
14
RFIs that should
never have happened
11 weeks
of schedule slip

All from errors that were sitting in the drawings before bid day.

Same drawings. Different outcome.

Manual Review
Team3 reviewers
Time72 hours
Issues found12
Coverage~25%
vs
BuildStackAI
Team1 upload
Time20+ minutes
Issues found47
Coverage~92%

You upload a PDF drawing set. BuildStackAI does the rest.

PDF
Upload
PDF drawing set
A S M E P
Extract
Sheets auto-classified by discipline
AI
Analyze
AI vision review with confidence scoring
X
Cross-Check
Cross-discipline coordination conflict detection
SPEC
Reconcile
Spec vs. drawing conflict detection
RPT
Review
Team validates findings, updates status, exports reports
Issues tracker with full audit trail — export CSV, PDF, or share a live report via link

Everything your pre-con team needs

Upload your drawings and specs. BuildStackAI runs automated checks, AI analysis, and cross-document QA — surfacing what matters before you hit the field.

QA
Automated QA Pipeline
A multi-stage pipeline builds a sheet map, extracts cross-references, and runs automated checks — catching missing references, dimension conflicts, wall type mismatches, and ambiguous notes before your team even opens the file.
Sheet mapping Reference extraction Automated checks
AI
AI-Powered Drawing Review
Every sheet gets reviewed by AI from a GC's perspective — flagging constructability conflicts, coordination clashes, missing dimensions, and code compliance gaps across all disciplines.
All disciplines Confidence scoring PDF native
SPEC
Spec-Aware Analysis
Upload your spec book alongside drawings. BuildStackAI parses CSI sections and cross-checks specifications against what's shown on the plans — catching conflicts between documents that manual review misses.
CSI section parsing Spec vs. drawings Cross-document QA
CODE
Code & Compliance Flagging
AI flags potential code compliance gaps based on your project's jurisdiction, building type, and phase — surfacing IBC, ADA, and local code concerns for your team to verify against the applicable edition.
Jurisdiction-aware IBC / ADA flagging Team-verified
LOG
Issue Tracking & Workflow
Every finding lands in a live tracker with severity ratings, confidence scores, and ownership assignment. Filter by sheet, type, or discipline. Flag false positives to improve future scans.
Status workflow Ownership False positive feedback
PDF
Reports & Sharing
Export a formatted issue report as PDF or CSV for your next OAC meeting. Share findings via a secure link with your design team or owner — no login required for viewers.
PDF & CSV reports Shareable links Scan history

Common questions

How accurate is it?
Every AI-generated finding goes through a second-opinion validation pass that filters false positives before anything surfaces. You also get a confidence score on every issue so you can prioritize your review. We're not replacing your reviewers — we're giving them a head start.
What file sizes can it handle?
We support PDF drawing sets from 500 to 1,000+ pages. Typical commercial sets process without issue.
Does it work for all disciplines?
Yes. BuildStackAI automatically identifies and organizes sheets by discipline — architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, civil, and landscape. Cross-sheet analysis then catches conflicts between disciplines that single-sheet reviews miss.
Can it check against project specs?
Upload your project specification alongside the drawings. BuildStackAI cross-references every finding against the spec — resolving issues the spec already addresses and flagging new conflicts between drawings and written requirements.

Stop finding these in the field.

We're onboarding a small group of teams for early access. Founder pricing locked for life.

No spam. No credit card. We'll reach out directly. By signing up you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms.

You're on the list. We'll be in touch shortly.
Want to see it first? Request a live demo